If you don't want to vote for Gomsak because the YC is still losing money there is absolutely nothing I can say that might change your mind because your fundamental premise is severely flawed. The premise is absurd in my view, but you are welcome to it, and can certainly cast your vote on the flawed premise. 52% of the country voted for Obama on what I saw as a flawed premise.  It was their right, flawed premise or not.

So, let's sum up -- Stachurski prefers Unger. Yet Unger approved the same budget you accuse Gomsak and all members of B&F and perhaps all board members of supporting. Since Stachurski is now your guiding light but Unger, like Gomsak, supported the budget and must certainly be more of a part of the YC problem than Gomsak, I suppose that only leaves Thompson and Dutch for you to vote for; neither of them voted for the budget in any way and neither has served on any committees recently.

(Entire email copied for easy reference).

Joe:

I am very disappointed in your response to my post.  It seems that you are adopting the old political maneuver of avoiding answering direct questions by taking comments out of context and misdirecting those comments into a line of thinking that suits your position.  Developing your diatribe only continues to further distance your response from my original questions...that remain unanswered.

Why not try to answer my questions without demeaning my intellect and without trying to impress everyone with yours?

You have taken my comment that I find Dan S.'s opinion to be credible and have manipulated that into a warped scenario that results in you knowing how I think and how I will vote.

You say you can't make this stuff up?  That, Joe, is a flawed premise...you just did!!

I'll add that although Mr. Gomsak seems to be more than qualified, it concerns me that his financial thought process may be in a stratosphere not unfortunately shared by many of us on fixed income types in the Pines.  I'm worried that what may seem a logical and somewhat inconsequential increase in assessments to Mr. Gomsak will not be felt that way by others.

If you disagree with me, I will not accuse you of having a flawed premise, as I would feel that to be a little pompous.  I would, however, like you to civily, and SPECIFICALLY, answer my original questions.

Respectfully, Linda