Bruce Bright apparently does not agree with your interpretation and wrote:

"Pretty sure this discussion is a re-run of a prior one. . .
The authority that CPI has (as stated in M-01) to go onto properties, reasonably and when absolutely necessary, to inspect for violations, is (in my opinion) legally implicit, based on the restrictions and prohibitions contained in the DRs and the associated enforcement powers. Without the ability to ascertain whether, where, and to what extent violations exist on properties, which in some cases might require entry to conduct an inspection, violations might continue unabated, might be hidden from view, and enforcement of the DRs might be rendered impossible in some cases. I believe a Court would agree.

"That said, CPI will never enter property without first seeking permission from the owner, they will exhaust all other means of observation (viewing from neighboring properties or the street), respect privacy, and they will exercise caution and always avoid surprise and/or confrontation."

Given Bright's success in court over HOA issues related to OPA, why would you not want to accept his interpretation - absent any contradicting case law.