2/29/2008 7:42:16 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 6: ECC/ARC/CPI Subject: Biancaniello Case Msg# 538961
|
||||||
Rick, I believe OPA asked for the court to say tear down the porch and the court did. Can't get much more draconian. As I understand it this is a very nice home with plenty of room to the rear for the porch and violates no county codes. This is strictly an arbitrary OPA issue over percent of lot coverage, an issue not even addressed in the DRs but "made-up" by ECC. Note as well that there have probably been many hundreds of allowed homes that go over the arbitrary coverage percent. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Both the ECC guidelines and the Declaration of Restrictions allow for reasonable variances. Now that OPA "won" in court, what draconian form of punishment or resolution does OPA have planned for Mr. and Mrs. Biacanello? |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
11/23/2024 - 9:00 A.M. 3 days or less away! |
Special Board Meeting - Board Room
11/25/2024 - 7:00 P.M. 3 days or less away! |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
12/21/2024 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |