4/2/2008 6:24:49 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 6: ECC/ARC/CPI Subject: Biancaniello Case Msg# 548838
|
||||||
Hi Rick, They want me to tear it down, even though the "Giudelines" starting at the bottom of page 6, say that "every numbered lot in every section" bordering land that won't be developed such as the golf course, get extra coverage points, even though under Exceptions it says if no harm is done the exception should be granted. Noone we have talked to have found any problem with the porch. It doesn't block anyones view, the house doesn't overpower the lot and we are the only house on our bloch our of eight without a porch, so if we are to be in architectural harmony with our neighbors as the "Guidelines" prescribe what do we do? How do you like them apples? My wife Mary Jean is on the verge of a nervous break down over this. We have appollogized repeatedly, offered to pay a reasonable fine etc. We are all partners and neighbors in OP. I don't know anyone who has experienced such negativeness or unreasonableness in a HOA. We built a beautiful home at 269 Windjammer Road on the ugliest lot you ever saw. Our Builder did a wonderful job for both us and the community. Now what do we do? |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Both the ECC guidelines and the Declaration of Restrictions allow for reasonable variances. Now that OPA "won" in court, what draconian form of punishment or resolution does OPA have planned for Mr. and Mrs. Biacanello? |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |