2/29/2008 11:47:32 AM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 6: ECC/ARC/CPI Subject: Biancaniello Case Msg# 538905
|
||||||
A mutually agreeable fine might see like a reasonable approach. However, wouldn't this approach essentially say violations and non-compliance by lot owners are for sale to those who want to buy? | ||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Joe: I must answer as a fellow association member, and not a member of the board of directors. It is also important to disclose that I testified in this case as an expert witness for the defense. I am not sure we won? I guess if your definition of to win is to beat up a customer, neighbor, fellow member for improving his property, then yes, we won. BTW, I am also pretty sure this case is not over. Was Mr. and Mrs. Biananello wrong in building the porch without the permission of the ECC? Perhaps? Does it now make sense for the Association to demand that he tear down the porch? I personally think not. As a member of the Association I would much rather see us impose a fine in a case like this and try to stem the increasing loss by the ECC department. By generating revenues from fines we can lower the assessments, rather than prevent members from improving their property and its value. Marty |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
12/21/2024 - 9:00 A.M. 3 days or less away! |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |