1/9/2005 7:15:28 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: First Things First Msg# 164924
|
||||||
Indeed, the hearing on Pennington Commons raised more questions than it answered. I was against Pennington Commons or any outside areas coming into the Ocean Pines plant. However, that war is over and my side on that lost. So be it. At this point we are moving forward with bringing outside subdivisions into Ocean Pines. It should at least be on a fair and equitable basis. Making OP take the $1 million risk for a developer wasn't a good beginning. I also question the amount being charged per connection, about $11,400. The county is basing that on an equity value of all infrastructure for the current plant of $60 million. To my knowledge there is no empirical data to back up that number. One would have to believe that we could today buy the property, build a 2.3 mgd state of the art sewage treatment facility, build all the existing pumping stations, install all the holding tanks scattered around Ocean Pines, and many miles of underground piping, etc., etc., for $60 million. Somehow I think the number may be a tad low. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Late in 2003, it was the Atlantic Coastal Bays Act that the commissioners enacted to "protect" the bays and limit development along the shorelines. This year, it's the OP Sewer/Pennington Commons issue that gets passed. Interesting juxtaposition - save the bays or pollute them? Just what are our leaders (if you want to call them that) trying to do? Seems to me that every chance the Commissioners can take to hurt the residents of OP, they do it. The Critical Bays act hurt property owners, especially those in OP, which could have been exempted from the Act without a single impact on the bays. (Interesting that Centex benefitted under that act). Now, the residents of OP may end up hurt by this wastewater expansion without first obtaining state approval and proper plant expansion. (Interesting that another developer benefits again.) Maybe I should begin developing land instead of just building a handful of homes per year! I don't have a problem with Pennington Commons hooking up to the current system if we're sure that the state will approve this increase and that pollutant discharge into the bays will remain the same. Why put the cart before the horse? Why couldn't the commissioners put the burden on the developer to pay the $1 mil if the state doesn't approve the hook up? I don't understand it. |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |