message board home
Next
6/26/2016 4:53:38 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Cordwell Again! Msg# 953659
|
||||||
|
Slobodan
To me they are signs and should not be on OPA property for any length of time. Since there are two one could argue they are a display... not an unreasonable position.... and as such should also not be there. I don't know why we restricted signs, etc. on OPA property. Could have been clutter, could have been fairness. It really doesn't matter. This is our rule and we should follow it. All one has to do is drop them down on the truck bed when parking on OPA PROPERTY... not a big deal. Jeff |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Sure Jeff, no problem. I wrote my post as clearly as possible... The issue about ARC "political sings" rule has already been discussed. I have no issues with that.... it is simple and clear. No need to further elaborate. However nobody thus far focused attention on the "display" word from the same ARC rule as it relates to subject event in photo (vehicle with 2 signs displayed). Do you have / wish to share your view on the "display" situation I brought up? Slobodan |
| Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |