Seems to me, if we accept that nterpretation, or perhaps it is Bailey's or perhaps Trendic's, one could make the case that the total road maintenance in front of each lot is the responsibility of each individual lot owner.

That would be ridiculous to implement, of course. Thus I believe the applicable language is:

"The Association shall be responsible for insect controls, for the maintenance, repair, and upkeep of the private streets, and parks within the Subdivision; the appurtenant drainage and slope easements reserved by Declarant;"

As for driveway pipes and the cost, having the owner responsible for those does not impact the above applicable language. I believe the County and State also control such driveway culverts while the landowner covers the cost, but surely don't say the landowners are responsible for drainage or road paving.

This entire issue is yet another stupid OPA fiasco causing problems where none exist, and to the detriment of our association. The board needs to control Bailey.