The Progress also says one director wants to give Bailey about a month; another until May 1; another six months; another wants immediate removal (given recent events it might be obvious who that board member is).

The above thus includes four board members who have discussed possible removal of the General Manager with a local driveway paper publisher... or possibly one board member who is leaking internal board discussions to the publisher. This is not right.

So.... six of seven board members have internally discussed their positions relative to a no-confidence vote, and individually, or via leaks, that information is on the front page of the Progress with a headline of:

Bailey under withering fire from directors unhappy with his job performance.

This Board of Directors, as an entity, is out of control, and operating in a manner that is harmful to the association. Sad.