"Although announced publicly as a decision of the Secretary, upon information and belief, it was a decision made by, or after consultation with, the full Board (including an incumbent running for re-election), without the involvement of the OPA Elections Committee."

The item below is essentially a charge made on behalf of all the plaintiffs that the Secretary Camilla Rogers and/or certain members of some purported board majority conspired to rig the election.

"The actions by the Board as alleged above were and are not in good faith, were and are outside the scope of the Board’s legitimate and lawful decision-making and authority, involve the election of Board members, and therefore are not protected by the ‘business judgment rule.’ Upon information and belief, in its decision-making as alleged above, the Secretary and/or certain
(majority) members of the Board acted to disqualify Plaintiff Farr’s candidacy as they did, in the midst of the already underway election, to preserve their majority ‘voting block‘ on the Board, i.e., for self-interested political reasons."