10/14/2022 7:41:44 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Court Finds for Janasek Msg# 1173484
|
||||||
The sitting board majority took action for one reason and one reason only, and that reason was because it was about Tom Janasek.
Did the judge say that? One would hope that the Oglesby decision was based on his interpretation of the law and our governing documents. Your comment above is a political statement, in my opinion. Every association member should hope to see this current board take whatever action is necessary to legally authorize the banning of any individual (association member in good standing or otherwise) for confronting any other person at our facilities with the language reported in the signed eyewitness report presented to the court. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Jac: Why do I bother? This case was absolutely a crystal clear poster child of “bad faith” by our past board majority and it should scare everyone of us. The sitting board majority took action for one reason and one reason only, and that reason was because it was about Tom Janasek. BTW, if I am not mistaken, at least two different Judges have ruled bad faith by the past board majority. Nobody is throwing the terminology around loosely, certainly not any Circuit court Judge. Marty |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |