It was only after the identity of Mr. Janasek became known to the Board that there was a special meeting called and a motion made to suspend Mr. Janasek’s right to use certain OPA amenities and facilities. The actions of the Board, in advising Mrs. Wheatley to report the matter to the police and then moving to suspend Mr. Janasek only after learning he was the other individual involved in the altercation, is a sufficient demonstration of bad faith to justify judicial review. Mrs. Wheatley’s own testimony shows beyond a doubt, that the Board’s ban of Mr. Janasek was in bad faith. She made the deliberate decision not to reveal Mr. Janasek’s identity to the other Board members when seeking their advice. She wanted their unbiased, unprejudiced opinions.