4/15/2024 8:43:21 AM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Another Sign Flap Msg# 1202358
|
||||||
The signs in question are not flags.
I understand that. My intention was to support your earlier statement of community confusion on signs and flags and your suggestion that it's time for a legal review and more clarity in the ARC guidelines. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Maybe I missed it but my DRs for section 5 (8. g.) does not mention flags. When is a flag also a sign? When it is a sign. The signs in question are not flags. Now I see McComas signs being placed on OPA property at mailboxes. They were also initially placed along Cathell Road on OPA property. All in violation. One laughable lot location has a McComas and a "I support Public School Education" next to each other, but placed on the OPA right of way. It may well be that Elena McComas supporters are harming her chances of re-election with all this. Additionally, the ARC guidelines addresses real estate flags as being non-permissible. The OPA website is still down, but I recall some Guideline language stating flags would be considered as signs. Surely no reasonable person should see any sign violation as not being a violation if the same message was on a flag. |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |