message board home
Next
10/15/2024 9:34:04 AM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: OPA Food & Beverage Contract Msg# 1213274
|
||||||
|
Steve, Rick Farr wrote to you: "Steve ~ You owe members of this board that possess the highest integrity an apology for making such outrageous and accusatory remarks regarding free food and booze at any MOC run restaurants."
Your accusations and/implications that current board members were accepting free food and booze from MOC were indeed outrageous. Nothing in my commentary remotely suggested that was the case. I specifically suggested that was not the case. I find it difficult to understand how or why you, or anyone, would jump to that conclusion and make such an accusation on a public forum, here or on Facebook as I understand others may be doing. Like Rick, I believe you owe this current board an apology. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Allow me to summarize Joe's article, I'll include all the relevant points: "Assuming OPA receives viable proposals from management firms other than MOC, the Board of Directors should receive whatever recommendation the General Manager proposes, MOC or otherwise, and approve it." That's it in a nutshell, case closed, moving on. I'd recommend to any company that applies for the 'job' that they make it known that they too will provide free food and booze to the board members who make the decisions re awarding contracts. As a matter of fact I'm considering a run for the Board . . . my campaign slogan will be "I want free booze (but I promise it won't influence my vote)". Sure, some may consider offering public officials gratuities to be bribery or graft or at least immoral and/or not fair, but let's not nit-pick . . . a former director justified the practice by saying it was a "compromise", the compromise being 'we won't give you free stuff at our place over here, but we'll give you free stuff at our place over there . . . this way it surely won't influence your decisions regarding our place over here'. The very serious point is, any board member who has accepted gratuities from the Matt Ortt Company must recuse themselves re any issue involving MOC. Our very competent GM needs to make the final decision. BTW, yes, the MOC has done a good job. But considering that the OPA's last year running the Yacht Club cost the association somewhere around 600k in losses, the Matt Ortt Company had nowhere to go but up. On top of that, the OPA started the game by giving the Matt Ortt team the ball on the 9 yard line . . . it was first and goal for the MOC on the opening play of the game thanks to the OPA, plus 'referees' who get gratuities/perks from one of the teams. Additional thoughts: The initial contract was ok'd after the record breaking Yacht Club losses mostly thanks to Brett Hill, who if I recall had free reign without proper board oversight (except for Slobodan Trendic I believe). Considering all this, I wonder if that board was overly generous to the Matt Ortt company just to make the contract happen? It is almost comical that some of the board members who sat at the table while the Yacht Club was hemorrhaging OPA money now boast that THEY were the ones to hire Matt Ortt. Of course they were . . . another year of losses and they would have been tarred and feathers. Steve Lind Colonial Village |
| Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |