Janet, in private emails you accuse me of losing credibility because I send some messages I post here to board members via email. I do send emails to board members, all seven and that includes you.

You have never, ever challenged or questioned any of those emails -- especially those that may have been critical of how Dan Stachurski has handled the Community Center post-referendum.

Yet when I emailed the following you take issue, saying I'm only "CYA" and "you lose credibility somehow."

I have essentially said what I have desired to say about the CC. I don't like some of the process since the referendum (as I have made more than perfectly clear), but I support the CC as a project and believe it will be a great asset, and the community overall will be glad we have it.

I'm not going to continue an endless debate of every comment made here, pro or con, so I will simply ignore your land value thrown in as part of the CC cost.

Having fully stated my position I'm leaving the field; others can do as they choose.

Frankly, I call 'em as I see 'em. Whether you or anyone else agrees or not is never a consideration.

I fully understand the anger of those opposed to the Community Center; in your case it appears to be intense anger. You and Marty were opposed before the referendum, so it is no surprise you are still opposed and doing everything to stop it. That is your right.

It is also my right to express my views. Please grant me the same courtesy I extend to you.

Now, let me ask a question. Have you signed the STOP petition Marty is circulating? I hope you have, since it would be extremely hypocritical for you not to sign it.