11/12/2006 8:34:26 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Community Center Contract Msg# 387997
|
||||||
Bill As for my motions for the November meeting, you quote one which is just housekeeping so to speak; bringing the policy into compliance with the practice in place for two or three years. This is a very poor reason for a motion. You should make sure bylaws are followed by OPA - not ignored. The practice of reporting depreciation by departments was stopped in FY 2005. It was in place much longer than it has been discontinued. Art Carmine did not inform anyone on the B&FAC that he was doing so. He did it because he felt it is not a necessary disclosure. Quite the contrary, Bill. As I hope you are aware, there are only four major costs types relative to each department - Operating Costs - Maintenance Costs - Taxes - AND CAPITAL COSTS = DEPRECIATION! It is not a coincidence that OPA stopped the practice of disclosing depreciation by departments in FY 2005. That was the very first year OPA recorded a decline in its NET ASSET position. As you recall, at the the Audting Meeting which you chaired in August, every panel member - including Art Carmine and TGM - admitted upon my questioning them that OPA's NET ASSET position is the single most important number to watch for gauging OPA's health. Two of the major factors in calculating that number are Depreciation Expense and Accumulated Depreciation. To propose that the capital cost component of a department should not be disclosed to property owners is irresponsible. You should be insisting that OPA provide more full disclosure - not less. I had a resolution passed at the annual meeting for more disclosures of capital costs. Your motion is diametrically opposite of the intent of this motion passed by THE PROPERTY OWNERS i.e. more disclosures. Finally, you know as well as I that OPA's greatest financial weakness is its capital management. Yet, your motion makes it likely that these weaknesses will be not even be disclosed - must less addressed. For these reasons, I urge you as Treasurer to withdraw your motion in favor of one directing OPA to comply with the by laws and disclose the capital cost of each department as well as the other cost types. Thank you, Gene |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Tony, As Treasurer I find it more important for me to be familar with the contract that exists between OPA and the investment firm in which we have $6 Million plus or minus of our money deposited than I am with the details for a $3.1 Million contract which Dan is responsible for. As for my motions for the November meeting, you quote one which is just housekeeping so to speak; bringing the policy into complience with the practice in place for two or three years. The other motion I'm making is far more important. At present, all interest earned by six of seven reserve accounts (bulkhead fund excepted) is transfered into the general operating funds each month. Right now thats about $100,000 plus per year. My motion will require that all interest earned by each reserve account must stay in that account to be used for future needs. The General Manager has stated that the contracts are signed and that they contain an arbitration clause. One very qualified lawyer has posted here the factors which would be used to determine our liability. I tried to explain the problem with trying to determine the $ degree to which OPA will be committed. There is no fixed cost to cancel the contract that can simply be announced to put this thing to bed. Bill Z |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |