11/11/2006 10:44:04 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Community Center Contract Msg# 387592
|
||||||
Tony, I'm starting this reply again. My computer locked up tight (to the point of requiring a cold restart) when I was most of the way through the first time. I am focusing on both but I'm not doing the second one out here in public on the forum. There are a long series of emails between Dan and myself which I choose not to discuss publically. I did touch briefly on them in my questioning of Dan at the last Board meeting. Although he appearently has discussed them with one of the papers, I won't go there. I'll just keep pushing and shoving from the shadows so to speak. As far as calculating a number for what the cost would be for OPA to default on the CC project we first need to make a bunch of assumptions. First, based on the message from Joe Schanno, we would be responsible for all costs incurred before shutdown and all anticipated profits for all parties. That is in addition to bills already paid. Lets assume, as is the current plan, that site plans are approved the first week of Dec. and building permits are issued the first week of Jan. In addition, that the project could be shutdown in Mid-Feb. based on the 75 day time allowance between petition and referendum per the bylaws. Also, for wild a** guess purposes, lets assume Blades $3,197,000 bid includes 15% profit and that the remander is 50% materials and 50% labor. 1. Expenses already paid -- $193,000 A Possible Cost for a Mid-February Shutdown -- $2,025,275 Are the figures accurate? Not really. Every percentage and every assumption can be argued up or down. But they are close enough to give you an "order of magnitude" idea of what we would face if we willfully default on the contracts. And don't forget that after paying those costs all you would have to show for it would be a very large and very expensive mud puddle in the middle of the Sports Core. Bill Zawacki |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Tony, As Treasurer I find it more important for me to be familar with the contract that exists between OPA and the investment firm in which we have $6 Million plus or minus of our money deposited than I am with the details for a $3.1 Million contract which Dan is responsible for. If Dan hadn't such a poor project management history, I'd agree with the above. Obviously, as an "executive with Xerox" you can and should focus on both. I totally agree with your other motion. That penalty amount is very important because it could be THE factor in whether the referendum petition suceeds. If a number was calculated now, it would likely represent the penalty floor and would provide some value in deciding the above.
|
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
11/23/2024 - 9:00 A.M. 3 days or less away! |
Special Board Meeting - Board Room
11/25/2024 - 7:00 P.M. 3 days or less away! |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
12/21/2024 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |