"Don't believe all that you hear."

By my statement above, I do not mean to say that we were told anything "incorrect."  I have learned that dealing with such issues as nontidal wetlands, the critical area buffers, and stormwater management that that broad questions often yield differing responses.  Also, there are so many nuances associated with the varying regulations that one must ask precise questions after reading the regulations.  Further, there can be many "correct" solutions, depending on the overall desired result.  In many cases, solutions are akin to an "art" vs. a "science."  We could design a huge SWM pond into WHP to achieve a satisfactory County solution to control runoff.  Then again, we could engineer an acceptable system of pervious pavers and holding tanks that retain the runoff on site that no one would even notice. 

For example, think back to that huge SWM pond designed by our engineer for the sports core area that we had to have as a result of the proposed new Community Center.  "We have no choice."   We are in the "critical area."  The approved SWM plan met the County requirements but destroyed a very green space open area.  I think of how that would have looked almost every time I am in that area.  Well, we learned that we had several choices and we were not in the "critical area."  This is complicated "stuff," and we need to ask for alternatives and be involved in the process.  Some people believe that asking hard questions and staying on top of the details is "micromanagement."  I believe it is just doing one's duty.