It is this kind of thinking that has us in the financial situation we are in today.

What does the above mean? Are you saying OPA is in bad financial condition, or what?

I'd say OPA is in excellent financial condition, and unlike you I don't want to get rid of the bayside property to gain a potential $8.50 per year benefit.

Why don't we all stop pussy-footing around the real issue behind Stachurski's comments and get to the heart of the matter, something few on this forum apparently understand. Stachurski, Sandusky, and the rest of that OPEG/support crowd believe Gomsak and Rakow are friends and they don't like Rakow's politics. Their immediate goal is to keep Dave Stevens as president and in control as much as possible.

Marty, you of all people, should know how tough Dan can operate at the OPA political level. He is intelligent, articulate, and can be one tough political opponent. Remember when he said at a public meeting that you were not an association member.

As for you not supporting the budget, it was your decision but as I recall it was based not so much on the totality of the budget but over relatively minor items such as leasing golf carts rather than buying them.