Marty, you make some excellent points but what makes this vote one of the most complicated I have seen in years is that some property owners have an opinion that supports neither one of the two options that are being presented by OPA. A yes vote could certainly be seen as a mandate for a failed restaurant operation.  On the other side a no vote could also be seen as a mandate for a rehab of the current facility that you support when the intent of the no vote may actually be to tear down the current facility but replace it with a smaller seasonal one that costs less than the 4.3 million proposed.  My referendum ballots are sitting on my kitchen table waiting for an epiphany to strike me before I check one of the boxes.