![]() ![]() Section 5: OPA Board Subject: COPE Golf Petition? Msg# 879219
|
||||||
Carol
Do you really think that readers can't see how you're consistently trying to low-ball the finanical impacts of OP golf (constantly saying $64). They've become extremely aware that you're slanting and spinning. They're hearing how there's really the higher impact within their total annual assessment ($113 or $120). Plus the significant capital amounts spent on drainage would be added on top of the $113 or $120, within their assessments being paid. The drainage project is costing big $$$, in the millions. So maybe its time to give low-balling a rest ?? |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Marty, Thanks for the info. I stand by my reply to Nancy using your number of $64 per property to cover golf losses, which is what she referred to when she used the $120, number. Yes, I have a rudimentary understanding of business economics. That's why I knew we didn't have golf losses amounting to $120 per property owner. |
Calendar |
![]() 3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 6/28/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 7/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |