3/16/2016 1:33:40 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: General Subject: Parks & Recs Cost Msg# 944208
|
||||||
My point was that if in fact we had been doing that...."sharing with the public" the IRS would not have been after us for "making a profit" on land that was not physically connected to Ocean Pines.Nancy
Hi Joe, This was discussed SO MUCH. How in the world could you forget about it? The land was not "contiguous with the rest of Ocean Pines". If it had been over with the rest of the development, we could have robbed our own people as much as we liked. They wouldn't have bothered us. That was the complaint, and obviously it stood up in court. How much do we charge Seacrets for using our land over by the bay? That is obviously something that is taxed fairly. Nancy |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: My point was that if in fact we had been doing that...."sharing with the public" the IRS would not have been after us for "making a profit" on land that was not physically connected to Ocean Pines. Difficult for me to comment about "physically connected" comment as I have not read the entire legal case and trial transcript, and I doubt you have either. |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |