![]() ![]() Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Legum & Norman Proposal Msg# 1012962
|
||||||
Brett
I believe we may be going about this the wrong way. I believe the best way to do this is to study, debate, and decide the best operational structure and processes for us. Alternatives should be considered here with no work on cost. Once decided... the work to get that solution at the best (not necessarily the lowest) cost should begin. This method is designed to produce the best overall solution for us... Comparing costs for various proposals before we decide what to do operationally is a waste of time... and is like comparing apples and oranges... IMHO Jeff |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Ed, The proposal is only a fraction of the documentation submitted by L&N. They actually provided very detailed plans for integration of their systems, responsibility matrices for all task required, and a project implementation schedule. Five of the current board members have had that information for nine months now, and in fact, Director Jacobs, when this was originally presented for board consideration last July, suggested the TWG needed to get involved in a review of this software. Unfortunately, the work of the TWG has been top secret, so who knows if Director Jacobs actually had the TWG consider the L&N option in their RFP process as she stated last July. Brett |
Calendar |
![]() 3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 6/28/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 7/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |