Reading all
63 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
Next
8/27/2022 3:28:53 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: New Sheriff in Town Msg# 1168366
|
||||||
|
KEN
Your assumption is wrong. It was totally legal for a new OP bylaw to impose new restrictions. But as a result YES it was necessary for Farr to change his mode of property ownership then restoring him to be eligible for re-election. There appears no one more directly effected. That's the politics of targeting. As well as targeting any folks in that class of equitable owners. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: That new bylaw, in effect, reverses the result from Farr's legal case. It overrides, it flouts that case's results. Becomes moot just a few months after the case was ruled upon. Tom, your position appears to be that the judge's decision in the Farr case precludes OPA members from voting to change their by-laws as it applies to eligibility to run for the board. It does not. |
| Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |