Joe -- You're seeing some great problem here where there is none. The Board had never before banned any member from amenities for conduct reasons. Ever. In all the years the OPA has owned and operated Food and Beverage amenities. And all has been fine, for all of those years, in OP. In all of those years, I'm certain rowdy OPA members have been effectively dealt with by facility management, many, many times (i.e., have been shown the door when appropriate). Nobody has filed any case over that, and nobody will. The OPA Board has never needed to become involved in member conduct at amenities in the way they selectively (and unnecessarily) chose to with Tom. And all has been perfectly fine. There is no crisis or awful consequence here for the OPA or its amenities. The import of the Judge's decision is, narrowly, that the Board majority couldn't do what it chose to do in this instance, and was acting in bad faith in this instance. That's all. The sky will not fall in OP because of that ruling. Things will keep humming along at the Yacht Club just as they have forever, and just as they have in the 5 months since May 20th. The OPA doesn't need, and has never needed, the type of Board member action that caused this lawsuit to be filed, period.