12/15/2022 6:38:33 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Parks Upset with Press Msg# 1179282
|
||||||
Joe -
Below is the whole letter that was emailed to the Gazette by Doug in reference to your commentary. The statement was circulated to all directors before it was sent. Thanks Rick
This same single-source, single-perspective approach was used in another article on the Knupp matter where Mr. Chavez published details of the meeting with Mrs. Knupp, Director Horn and myself and assumed everything Mrs. Knupp said was the absolute truth and was interpreted by those in the meeting in the manner she noted. I can tell you as one of the participants in the meeting that there were several discrepancies in the information presented in the article written by Mr. Chavez. The goal of this request is to hopefully establish fair reporting of OPA-related issues and business that includes accurate information, that is based in facts and has involvement from more than one perspective and source of information. Perhaps Mr. Chavez can consider the approach used by former Gazette reporters Greg Ellison and Josh Davis. Both gentlemen wrote articles that were based on fact rather than opinion and were not afraid to publish articles that in some cases did not shed a good light on OPA. However, at the very least Greg Ellison and Josh Davis strove to get both sides of an issue before writing an article, which in my opinion lends credibility to the content of their articles. While you may deny the request to have Mr. Chavez not report on OPA business and related issues, I recommend you remove him from covering and attending OPA Board meetings. Within our governing documents the Board can deny a member of the media from attending the meeting with a majority vote. The preference is to take care of this issue between us ahead of time with the intent to avoid any embarrassment associated with Mr. Chavez being asked publicly to be removed from the meeting. I also look at this issue as temporary given that once notified of the opinion OPA leadership has on the matter, adjustments and changes can certainly be made. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information as I would be glad to discuss the matter further as necessary to get to a reasonable solution to the issue. Respectfully, |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: This commentary is inaccurate. The issue at hand was to ask the Gazette to have their reporter give the board a common courtesy to respond to a story or stories that they are directly involved with. Since the prior reporter left (Greg Ellison) not one time has the board been asked to comment or respond to a story or accusation that involves the board. It was a simple request - nothing more - nothing less that the Gazette has no issue with. Hi Rick. I stand 100% behind what I wrote. This can be cleared up quite easily -- provide a copy of the letter. The topic is certainly not protected under the HOA Act. I do not dispute what you say was in the letter. However, my sources indicate there was more in the letter than what you referenced. Was the letter on OPA letterhead? Was it an email? Did the board vote to authorize the president to send such a letter? |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
11/23/2024 - 9:00 A.M. 3 days or less away! |
Special Board Meeting - Board Room
11/25/2024 - 7:00 P.M. 3 days or less away! |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
12/21/2024 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |