If you don't want to vote for Gomsak because the YC is still losing money there is absolutely nothing I can say that might change your mind because your fundamental premise is severely flawed. The premise is absurd in my view, but you are welcome to it, and can certainly cast your vote on the flawed premise. 52% of the country voted for Obama on what I saw as a flawed premise.  It was their right, flawed premise or not.

So, let's sum up -- Stachurski prefers Unger. Yet Unger approved the same budget you accuse Gomsak and all members of B&F and perhaps all board members of supporting. Since Stachurski is now your guiding light but Unger, like Gomsak, supported the budget and must certainly be more of a part of the YC problem than Gomsak, I suppose that only leaves Thompson and Dutch for you to vote for; neither of them voted for the budget in any way and neither has served on any committees recently.