Here is some text from the lease:

Lessee shall utilize the property for parking only with the exception of certain improvements heretofor made within the leased property including a sound wall extending onto the parking area, installation of dining booths used for food and beverage service, and construction of storage/restroom facilities, all for "Seacrets" nightclub which extend onto Lessors property, which said improvements have been constructed by Lessee and which said improvements are hereby acknowledged by Lessor.

After reading the above I'm sorry I didn't use a stronger word than "debacle" to describe this deal. Remember how OPA played down the encroachment last year, mentioning only the sound wall? Apparently Seacrets, without OPA permission, not only built the sound wall on OPA property, but also dining booths and storarge/restroom facilities.

OPA's strong response to the encroachment? A really tough negotiation that results in a new lease actually reducing Seacrets total costs. You can't make this stuff up.

Seacrets has taken OPA to the cleaners..... again.