3/6/2012 6:00:17 AM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: OPA Loses IRS Case Msg# 823720
|
||||||
Joe:
"The appeal was not a Gomsak decision" Certainly no more then the $900,000.00 un-budgeted greens project, or the five year funding plan that has grossly increased our assessments and reserve balances. He did in fact make the motion. "It sounds like you are insinuating Gomsak did something unethical or worse" I personally believe that Mr. Gomsak's behaviour in the matter of hiring PWC was unethical. He made the motion and then voted on the motion. He should have, at the very least, publically disclosed his relationship with PWC and then recused himself from the vote. Marty |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: The appeal was not a Gomsak decision. It was a board decison, supported by our CPA firm and our attorney in Baltimore. The lead attorney was a firm in Baltimore. I think Gomsak recommended consultation with Price Waterhouse Cooper, a firm he retired from in 1999, as they are specialists in tax law. It sounds like you are insinuating Gomsak did something unethical or worse. |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |