11/22/2015 12:58:26 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: It Was Embarrassing Msg# 937136
|
||||||
IMHO the answer to 1 is no, he does not. By appointing a BOD member and their accepting, he by definition already has received their tacit approval. This was demonstrated in the silly superfluous vote that the GM instructed them to conduct.
The president needs confirmation of his appointments from the entire board, not the member being appointed.... although that is perhaps a needed requirement. Perhaps you missed the entire issue. Renaud appointed himself, Terry and Cordwell as a committee to represent OPA in dealings with Landscapes Unlimited. When he made those appointments he did not tell the rest of the board, ask for the entire board vote, or even appoint them via a "without objection" appointment during a meeting of the board. So, if Renaud did not tell the board, how could he have received "tacit approval?" The bylaws say the president can appoint but must have confirmation of the entire board. This is typically done by appointing without objection at a meeting or by a motion and vote at a meeting. Until now I don't recall it being done privately/unilaterally by the president without even telling the rest of the board members. Cordwell kept mentioning the prior appointees had no business experience. What experience does Cordwell, or Renaud, or Terry have in running golf courses? I think OPA hired LU for THEIR experience in that regard. The issue at hand is how LU intends to increase memberships at the golf amenity, as was their admitted business plan when OPA hired them. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: There were 2 big points of contention raised in this video (which we will never see on America's Funniest BTW). The 1st was whether or not the Pres. needs board approval of his golf liaison appointments. The 2nd was whether they should be golfers or a more overall representative of the community. IMHO the answer to 1 is no, he does not. By appointing a BOD member and their accepting, he by definition already has received their tacit approval. This was demonstrated in the silly superfluous vote that the GM instructed them to conduct. The answer to 2 is that they should be golfers or at least an advocate of the golf amenity. The reasons for this should be obvious and I was disappointed in Ms Jacob's remarks which demonstrated to me she does not understand the distinction between the responsibilities of a Board member and those of an elected politician. |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
11/23/2024 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
12/21/2024 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |