In another post you also wrote, "After the annual meeting, several comments have been made to the effect that the GM is "stupid" to be considering the impact on owners who may have resource or physical condition limitations that may inhibit their ability to comply with potential owner drainage responsibilities. No, the GM would properly be subject to criticism if he did not foresee such potential issues should owners be subject to drainage responsibilities not now in effect."

These two statements seem to be somewhat at odds. As was the case with the deferred annual charge item, there is no distinction in our documents allowed for homeowner resources or physical condition. If the DRs clearly and unequivocally say that owners are responsible under the DRs for certain drainage responsibilities, the DRs should be enforced with no consideration of income or physical ability of the owner.