9/21/2020 5:35:38 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Bainbridge Drainage Msg# 1098388
|
||||||
Kerry, drainage work has continued as much or more as since you left.
the new infrastructure will take the water where it goes now. That is the problem. It now goes to River Run. I am told River Run can take no more. Let's make one thing clear. I am not opposed to spending money on OP drainage. I just want to be sure it is spent wisely. I am not so sure that spending $800,000 on a phase one with no idea at all as to phase 2 is the smart thing without additional planning and review. What assurances are there that a phase one will actually reduce flooding enough to justify the cost? Or reduce the probelm at all? Why lose the grant if it can help with infrastructure? At this point there is no grant. Based on local paper reporting and Commssioner comments, the grant is not coming. Instead, the state will again review and vote/decide on if we get any money. It is not assured. Phase this project out for the next 5 years and it CAN be fixed it just takes effort and time and most of all $$. The above makes no sense. What are you propose to phase out over five years? Do you think the board is going to take a $4 million to $10 million ditch/pipe down Beauchamp Road to referendum? I'd vote YES, if there were no other options. What is more important, an $8 million Yacht Club or solving a drainage problem for 1000 property owners? |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Joe, look at this from another side please, I will try to give you my best solution: Here are some facts: 1. The infrastructure if they doing nothing else needs replaced due to age this has needed to be done for at least 15 years or so. 2. If they have to replace pipes, work on the ponds and replace other infrastructure why would you not upgrade? Digging in Ocean Pines in the this manner is a major task of its own. Its a lot of hand digging to find all the utilities and what ever else you may find. This drives the cost for sure and why would you want to go back in 5 years if you ever get the land or find a new way to discharge water and dig again? Makes no sense the new infrastructure will take the water where it goes now. 3. Why lose the grant if it can help with infrastructure? Its obvious that Many boards have not approved a dime to replace it. I may be talking a little out of turn as Eddie Wells may have done some work there but for sure not all what is needed because he does not have the $$ 4. I can remember the Big Pipes we replaced on Boston drive that really did not change anything other than they were wore out and stayed clogged which in turn helped the drainage. We dug around every utility for days and never hit any of them but it takes TIME 5. This may be a bad comparison but if I wanted a new irrigation system because mine was worn out, and wanted to run 50 Sprinklers but my pump was only good for 30 but there was a very good chance later down the road I could get the 50 head pump why would I dig my yard twice? Bottom line is there is a drainage problem in section 3 and surrounding area and every time it comes up for discussion about how to fix it Ocean Pines has always taken the approach it costs too much, it will not work. Phase this project out for the next 5 years and it CAN be fixed it just takes effort and time and most of all $$. Yes there are questions that need answered and I applaud you for asking but please look at this in Phases not all or NOTHING |
Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |