Who is in charge?  The elected officials should be in charge, Viola is an appointee.

BTW, I have seen Viola and Perrone glued to each others side several times at the (golf) clubhouse.  Do not read anything into that statement, I am not implying anything, I am just stating fact. (But as a side note, it concerns me that board members/gm may be sticking there nose into Matt Ortt business . . . who came up with the clubhouse food/drink discount provided to golfers, a discount that is just another stealth subsidy to what has been a perpetual money pit, a discount that excludes the property owners who paid millions for the new golf clubhouse.  Did the gm and/or the several board members - - who are golfers and frequent the clubhouse - - interfere with Ortt management by suggesting/requesting/insisting that a discount be provided?)

Getting back to Janasek, as a former board candidate I have spoken to him informally many times re OPA matters, he has never made any disparaging/unethical remarks to me re Viola.  Again, just saying, not making any kind of determination.

It is hard to imagine that anything Janasek did could not be addressed by applying a "lesser remedy" than dismissal. But if he is in fact dismissed by a board that succumbs to a 'it's either him or me' threat, an elected official being removed because of such an ultimatum would be a bad, bad thing for the community.  Every board member must be able to make independent decisions without being fearful of the wrath of any gm.

Steve Lind