The person accused was Perrone, not Phillips. 

There never a criminal charge of any kind. Talking about constitutional rights in this situation is absurd. Those rights are typically reserved to the people charged, not the person charging. 

Keep in mind that OPA did not fire Colby. OPA simply found that the investigation by the attorney did not provide sufficient evidence of her charges that Perrone violated B-08. There are no constitutional issues here.

I believe any summary would be more complete it it has mentioned that Colby was not even allowed to be at the board meeting where her grievance[s] were being discussed and voted upon. 

I have written as much, while also suggesting the board's decision on the B-08 charges would probably have been the same. The board should have heard her charges directly, face to face.

Consider this -- you are an OPA employee making a good salary for this part of the country. Based on the interviews mentioned in the report it certainly seems no employee jumped unabashed to strongly support Colby.

Others in these meetings were GM Viola, Doug Parks, Collette Horn, and Larry Perrone. Perrone and the other three say Perrone did not yell or act disrespectfully. I have no idea what transpired at meetings I did not attend. However, based on the information provided to the board by the lawyer, please tell me how the board as an entity could have voted that Perrone violated B-08.