YUP  And during investigation of this issue the tables were turned against Colby.  Seemed they were using the OP's attorney to dig up assertions against her, making her into a target.  Incidentally, both sides, had it been a legal case have the right to be there and the right to cross examine.

That OP attorney did not interview Colby's corroborating witnesses, to the Perrone issues. A big gap in fairness to be heard.  Whereas you mentioned: GM Viola, Doug Parks, Collette Horn, and Larry Perrone -- say Perrone did not yell or act disrespectfully.   Kinda unfair to allow Perrone's witnesses, but not Colby's to tell their side.  

Sure there's all sorts of technical differences -- like saying its not a criminal case.  Yet fair minded folks would expect the same kinds of principles be used in our community.   And folks would be correct to object on ethical grounds.  

When I wrote this: I believe any summary would be more complete it it has mentioned that Colby was not even allowed to be at the board meeting where her grievance[s] were being discussed and voted upon.   Then you answered:  The board should have heard her charges directly, face to face.  

I'd add the board should have heard the witnesses on Colby's side. 

Or just allow those witnesses written statements.  News these days are filled with unnamed whistle blowers statements.  Perhaps the investigating attorney could keep their names confidential, if they had been interviewed.  In this current OP climate, I'd understand how they could be fearful of reprisals or firings, and keep their names secret.  

Again: I believe any summary would be more complete it it has mentioned that Colby was not even allowed to be at the board meeting where her grievance[s] were being discussed and voted upon.  

Nor to present her witness statements.