I'm not referencing any unfavorable information.  What I said was "if unfavorable information may exist..."  Unless the board did their due diligence in vetting Landscapes they  would not know if such information existed.  

I didn't hear any board member say that an exhaustive process of vetting Landscapes had been accomplished.  What I heard Mr. Stevens say was the decision has already been made to go with Landscapes so bringing up any further information that may bear on that decision was not appropriate, unless you bring it up in private.

are you simply suggesting a witch hunt to find for anything unfavorable to Landscapes Unlimited?

Of course not.  I'm saying that the board should have accomplished due diligence when considering any of the applicants to run our golf course.  If they did so, then great, if they did not then they need to accomplish that prior to entering into a contract with anyone. 

The bottom line here is to do the right thing in the best interest of the OPA members.  That applies to the board as well as Mr. Thompson.