![]() ![]() Section 21: Community News Subject: Josh Davis Gone From OPA Msg# 1223105
|
||||||
A difference between OPA and most organizations is that employees of OPA work for the association members who are paying the freight so to speak.
As a former OPA employee in the HR, who sued OPA and lost, you should know that OPA employees are employed by the corporation and are not employees of the lot owners. The lot owners elect a board. The board hires a GM. The GM hires all other employees. Yes personnel matters generally should remain private/confidential but the interest/concern when something like this happens abruptly and without explanation is only natural. Generally? When should OPA reveal anything about employer/employee relations? Seems to me that is a formula for legal action harmful to the Association. In general people prefer transparency. That should never happen unilateraally by an OPA action when it comes to employer/employee relationsships. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: A difference between OPA and most organizations is that employees of OPA work for the association members who are paying the freight so to speak. Your argument makes it sound like association members should never have a voice or response regarding operational issues. Yes personnel matters generally should remain private/confidential but the interest/concern when something like this happens abruptly and without explanation is only natural. In general people prefer transparency. |
Calendar |
![]() 4/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 6/28/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 7/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 8/9/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |