While I could comment on what I know - or think I know - I believe it would be best if the GM through our Public Affairs Department keep the membership informed.  There is just too much potential for a misstatement were Marty or I to speak for OPA.  BTW, to respond to Nancy Weber's comment on why the site was changed to the other side of WHP, as I understand it the principal reason was that codes require specific setbacks for fire stations and the site next to the CH along the road did not have the depth to  allow for that.

Bill:

I was not aware we had a Public Affairs Department.  Who is the Public Affairs Officer?

I don't understand how a member of the BOD could misspeak about such an important issue.  Either you know what is going on or you don't.  If you do, please share with us.  If you don't know what is going on, which, by the way, I doubt, then tell us you don't know what is going on.  If you know what is what, how could you misspeak?  When did the GM become the mouthpiece for you?  I've always known you to be up front with the membership and speak your mind.  You haven't avoided comments or questions in the past.  What has changed?  Also, what is your comment about Bill Zawacki violating the by-laws in signing that contract?  Did he or did he not have the BOD's approval?  No one seems to want to answer.

Regards, Linda