5/6/2010 4:57:16 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: OC Bayside Debacle Msg# 737986
|
||||||
If not, how do you recall the conversation? I do not recall the conversation, but I believe this entire exchange of yours regarding the lease is premature. What you could be doing is giving the impression that the Board really screwed this up and you are going to show the members how. This, IMO, is a disservice to the membership that we all serve. I am disappointed. I do not understand why you feel the need for instant information gratification and to attack the provisions of a lease you have not even seen. The lease will be posted when we get a returned signed copy. I just don't get it.... or maybe I do. It's your right to do it. Giving advice to Ray to put his signs back up may be within his "rights," but it would be pretty unwise of him to do so. Being a cooperative candidate and going along with the wishes of the election committee is a good thing to do. Compliance is voluntary, but following your advice would be a very bad idea. My point is, you get too hung up on "rights" and forget the issue or can't see the bigger picture. Bad advice, Joe. Maybe it's time to stop posting here, not because I am "afraid" of the exchanges; I kind of enjoy it most of the time. It's just that IMO it is no longer the important issues that are being addressed. It's about making issues of non issues, and providing responses for clarification are ignored. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: A few times you have quoted a certain director who you say provided you incorrect information regarding the lease. I still don't know what you are referencing. Who is this certain director? I believe I have mentioned Les Purcell, but don't recall saying he gave me incorrect information. In fact it would appear he was correct, and I have said as much. I have mentioned talking with you immediately after the last board meeting. At that time I asked you about Marty's comment during the public meeting where he said we would have to ask permission of Seacrets to do anything on the bayside property, in the context of the Art Sachs presentation about a walkway and his meeting with the OC people. At that time I also suggested to you that I was under the impression the prior lease was for "parking only" and didn't otherwise limit OPA's use of the property. You said words to the effect that you did not know and I should do my own research. You also added that in the unlikely event OPA decided to build a walkway, the lease would make no difference since OPA has good relations with Seacrets and OPA would receive permission. After you and I talked Les Purcell went and looked at the old contract and told me the expiring one for for parking only. Is the above what you are talking about, or what? If so, I believe the above is a rather accurate representation of what occurred after the last board meeting, wouldn't you agree? If not, how do you recall the conversation? |
Calendar |
Special Board Meeting - Board Room
11/25/2024 - 7:00 P.M. 3 days or less away! |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
12/21/2024 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |