3/22/2021 6:52:47 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: A Fine Kettle of Fish Msg# 1117473
|
||||||
PS Another interesting thing if we compare this to a legal case: The prosecution, in the legal case, argues its case first, then the defense next, then finally the prosecution gets the final arguments, going last. In other words, the prosecution has the benefit of arguing twice. Of course, when arguing last, there's opportunity to contest and provide clarifications of any disputed information.
I'd bet such procedure would not be honored by an OP board, when one of its own was being charged, as they would strongly want to get the last word onto the record. Go figure. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: I'm thinking I read that the information from Colby's witnesses did not come forward to the board. That their statements were not brought to the attention of the board. Seemed like only the attorney summary was considered by the board. Maybe that can be clarified ? Were there gaps in the information going to the board or not ?? Certainly was a big gap, without Colby being there, for rebuttal -- or filling information gaps |
Calendar |
Special Board Meeting - Board Room
11/25/2024 - 7:00 P.M. 3 days or less away! |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
12/21/2024 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
1/25/2025 - 9: A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
2/22/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
3/29/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |